Ahhh yes, i forgot about the VRMs, my appolagies, as long as it provides the same voltage as a 90nm one, i dont see the problem people swapping out to a 40nm, besides the 40nm ones are bulletproof compared to the 90nm, and with that massive 60GB Cooler, i presume temps will be on the 50ºs threshold or below, since is what a 40nm from a 2104 did run for me with a delid,and thats underload.RSX and CELL voltages are supplied by VRM. It's the same type of VRM that is used on PC motherboards - some buck converters with PWM controller operated by VID. Simply put, RSX/CELL tells VRM what voltage it wants (by sending it voltage identification, VID) and VRM supplies it. On CECHA, RSX PWM controller is NCP5318FTR2G - it can produce voltages between 0.8375V and 1.6000V, whatever of which RSX really wants. So voltage is not a problem here.
I wonder if the fact we have all the syscon keys for the COK001 motherboards would allow us to pair another CELL now somehow, that would be interesting.Shame the CELL is paired with the syscon, if it wasnt, that would guarantee another swap, would make the ultimate backwards compatible.
Is the kind of thing that should be tryed by someone that works in a repair service and have a bunch of PS3 motherboards stacked in a pile as "damaged"very intereting indeed. problem is i have cechc with bad rsx and a slim where the rsx is good. but nobody here makes the rebal in my country. if it were so i will be already trying this.
Overclocking on a console, i am not much interested in it, i do it mostly on a PC due to much better maintenance and cooling than a console, i see no benefits on a console for a huge heat exchange for a fraction of the framerate, anyway, but I am really interested in this topic, see where it goes, and hopefully in the near future once all has been figured it out, we can swap the old 90nm fabric for a more cooling 45/40nm with both CELL and RSX, on the 60Gb making this a more reliable source of new chips, and easier to obtain.I wonder if the fact we have all the syscon keys for the COK001 motherboards would allow us to pair another CELL now somehow, that would be interesting.
The overclocking potential of newer chips with bigger older coolers could be interesting too.![]()
Well many are interested in it, and no one has ever overclocked a 40nm with CECHA heatsink and fan control so how "huge" the extra heat to extra framerate ratio would be is yet to be determined IMO.huge heat exchange for a fraction of the framerate,
Overclocking consoles is bullshit . especialy ps3. with its underperforming cooling. no interested in that. but changing my not working rsxin my cechc would be awesome.Well many are interested in it, and no one has ever overclocked a 40nm with CECHA heatsink and fan control so how "huge" the extra heat to extra framerate ratio would be is yet to be determined IMO.
You might not be. But plenty are interested in reinstating the clock speeds used in pre retail OFW. Sony reduced the clock and mem speeds approx 10% before release probably along with that they reduced the fan speed.Overclocking consoles is bullshit . especialy ps3. with its underperforming cooling. no interested in that. but changing my not working rsxin my cechc would be awesome.
Yeah they know why.You might not be. But plenty are interested in reinstating the clock speeds used in pre retail OFW. Sony reduced the clock and mem speeds approx 10% before release probably along with that they reduced the fan speed.
thats sound interesting. but first we must prove that it can be done. and then how many peaple will vandalize working slims to do that?you do not have to be interested, I was not trying to tell anyone what they should do? My point is that the 40nm rsx runs way cooler and needs less power, So in conjunction with the bigger heatsink from fat we might be able to get that speed back by overclocking it without any downside. It would probably help in some games like farcry
40nm RSX - CXD5300DGB. So this is it, CECHA00 with hardware BC, COK-001 MB, WiFi module, 90nm CELL and 40nm RSX from SuperSlim model.
Well, chronologically (based in the serial numbers) the CXD5300DGB should be for PS3 Slim
In other words... in between CECH-25xx and CECH-30xx
Far Cry 3 and 4 are my favorites haha. Imagine a CECHA with a, let's say "custom RSX", and overclocked. Like I said, that "must be worh something else". $$$$$You might not be. But plenty are interested in reinstating the clock speeds used in pre retail OFW. Sony reduced the clock and mem speeds approx 10% before release probably along with that they reduced the fan speed.
you do not have to be interested, I was not trying to tell anyone what they should do? My point is that the 40nm rsx runs way cooler and needs less power, So in conjunction with the bigger heatsink from fat we might be able to get that speed back by overclocking it without any downside. It would probably help in some games like farcry
That serial from the link is CXD5300AGB... but CXD5300DGB is a newer revision
Some are AGB, A1GB or DGB, which the "5300" only changing from SUR mobos till MPX's. We know that the 5300DGB works on a COK-001, and every RSX seems to share the same traces, but not all of them are compatible with every mobo, so the key here are the last three letters. So we only have to know if AGBs and A1GBs are compatible with a CECHA. And taking in mind too that grounded resistor.That serial from the link is CXD5300AGB... but CXD5300DGB is a newer revision
Compare in the table in wiki, CECH-21xx and CECH-25xx are all them CXD5300A...
https://www.psdevwiki.com/ps3/RSX#Serial_Numbers_.40_SKU.27s
True, although I am not excluding it for the interested minds, i was talking mainly with a purist hardware, i honestly prefer overclocking on PCs again for they're flexibility, on Consoles i like to experience the Hardware as it should be, but i am sure LuanTales would be interested in overclocking to integrate it as part of the PS3 Pro Mod.Well many are interested in it, and no one has ever overclocked a 40nm with CECHA heatsink and fan control so how "huge" the extra heat to extra framerate ratio would be is yet to be determined IMO.