You sure you can handle 800/950?
what firmwares are these? 4.91 beta ??
Yes, beta 6.
I think you missed my requests because my posts are delayed. Hopefully you'll see this post. Could you make a 725-950 file? please.
Yup. I have 2 November manufactures. 1 can only do 700/950, the other does 750/950 stable no problems. The lottery varies by 50mhz.
That's the latest beta so far right?
Could you make a 725-950 file? please.
No. He should never go above 1000 unless he has a flasher. Cause memory is what caused me a near brick. 1000 is perfectly stable for him. He just needs to work on core now. I'm super jealous too. It's the fastest PS3 on the planet. And the performance gain accross all games is massive! It's literally a PS3 Pro!
Would u be able to send me the CFW for the 2000er Slim ?For 65nm slims, 700MHz on core is possible and seems to be stable. I tried 750MHz but it make every game crash. So 700MHz is the safe limit on core for 65nm models. Of course, 650MHz is probably a bit safer and it's already enough for many games.
As for VRAM, the highest clock I tried (except the fatal 1000MHz that bricked my first CECH-2004) was 800MHz BUT on a very short period so I can't say if it's really safe to use. Games were working well though.
I won't try any higher memory values than 800MHz on my new CECH-2004 as I'm too scared to get a second door wedge :')
And even trying 800MHz scares me a bit. After all, those two 2004B have different date codes and the second one is a bit older [ first 2004B : 0A / second 2004B : 9C ].
So until someone with a hardware flasher can affirm that 800MHz is stable on the long run, we should consider 750MHz the last safe memory value for 65nm models.
EDIT : Okay I tried 700/800 on my second CECH-2004B and it did not brick it, yay !(I was itching to try.)
But really, I won't go further. I'm not that mad.
For 65nm slims, 700MHz on core is possible and seems to be stable. I tried 750MHz but it make every game crash. So 700MHz is the safe limit on core for 65nm models. Of course, 650MHz is probably a bit safer and it's already enough for many games.
As for VRAM, the highest clock I tried (except the fatal 1000MHz that bricked my first CECH-2004) was 800MHz BUT on a very short period so I can't say if it's really safe to use. Games were working well though.
I won't try any higher memory values than 800MHz on my new CECH-2004 as I'm too scared to get a second door wedge :')
And even trying 800MHz scares me a bit. After all, those two 2004B have different date codes and the second one is a bit older [ first 2004B : 0A / second 2004B : 9C ].
So until someone with a hardware flasher can affirm that 800MHz is stable on the long run, we should consider 750MHz the last safe memory value for 65nm models.
EDIT : Okay I tried 700/800 on my second CECH-2004B and it did not brick it, yay !
But really, I won't go further. I'm not that mad.
My god. Honestly I'd be fully happy with 900/1000. That shit should fix practically 90% of games on PS3. And along with using an SSD. That will be peak. I suspect now. We're gonna start Causing huge binning wars
What PS3 do you have?
I have a CECH2004A 9C Date Code
Damn I don't even know what PS3 this is or how the date codes work. I'm mostly familiar with American PS3 codes.
