sandungas
Developer
No idea, maybe changing the names of that list, but i was thinking what you did by adding system_plugin.sprx maybe is handyHow would we go about changing the list to link system_plugin.sprx to itself, instead of basic_plugins.sprx?
It looks basic_plugins.sprx and system_plugin.sprx was working together like if it was a single file, but are 2 (and one of them can contain custom code), is something unespected but maybe we can take advantage of it... dunno
For the .rco what we did with xai_plugin.rco initially was to remove most of the contents to create a "dummy" without any conflicts, but we keept 1 image under imagetree, 1 plane under objecttree and something like that (i was trying to see how to minimize it but at the same time trying to not break it, lol)
It was working, so i made some more versions removing most things and trying to make it minimal... if i remember right, at the end the only thing we kept is a "name" that appears at top that seems to be the label of the rco (but uses to be weird)
Im guessing for the tests you are doing you should do the same... take a look at the xai_plugin.rco of the mysis release to see how much it was removed