[Update] Install Multiple PKG at Once in OFW become Possible

[Joonie]

You mean when you use the install all package files option.

Interesting. I will look as nas_plugin.rco to see if there is any page names i can swap to enable it. Can you look at the sprx for possible patches that could be done with HAN exploit?

Not sure, before anything we should at least get that option appeared without qa flag first..

 

[DeViL303]

Not sure, before anything we should at least get that option appeared without qa flag first..

I think its there already. it just errors with the error mentioned in OP.

 

[Louay]

No SPRX patches in RAM, we can patch VSH memory only AFAIK.

VSH is a self module and self is same like sprx it need officiel signature to be run on OFW and as far as i know patches on CFW VSH hexing doesn't enable the ability to install packages

 

[DeViL303]

it need officiel signature to be run on OFW

Patching it in RAM is different, its decrypted once loaded afaik, so it can be patched.

 

[Louay]

Patching it in RAM is different, its decrypted once loaded afaik, so it can be patched.

Yes i know that i just mention it to show comparaison of self and sprx are same probably

 

[Joonie]

I think its there already. it just errors with the error mentioned in OP.

QA combo doesn't work on OFW 3.56+ I'm not sure how he was able to get that option appeared.

 

[DeViL303]

QA combo doesn't work on OFW 3.56+ I'm not sure how he was able to get that option appeared.

I think it always shows, Just doesn't work unless QA flagged. That is the way i understood it. Always shows when on usb root section of package manager.

 

[Joonie]

I think it always shows, Just doesn't work unless QA flagged. That is the way i understood it.

no, disable qa then switch to retail vsh to see if that works.. the reason why it works on cfw is because of token patch + qa flag in eeprom.

 

[Louay]

QA combo doesn't work on OFW 3.56+ I'm not sure how he was able to get that option appeared.

No didn't get the combo to work cause can't QA Flag on OFW

I think it always shows, Just doesn't work unless QA flagged. That is the way i understood it. Always shows when on usb root section of package manager.

Yes but my test has been done on CFW console the error is same for HAN

 

[lmn7]

VSH is a self module and self is same like sprx it need officiel signature to be run on OFW and as far as i know patches on CFW VSH hexing doesn't enable the ability to install packages

The HAN/Debug PKG exploits are VSH memory patches, ask the developers yourself. The exploit itself dumps the VSH memory then patches it. I could be wrong about only being able to dump VSH though, I don't have all the technical details of the exploit.

 

[Louay]

The HAN/Debug PKG exploits are VSH memory patches, ask the developers yourself. The exploit itself dumps the VSH memory then patches it. I could be wrong about only being able to dump VSH though, I don't have all the technical details of the exploit.

i don't know that enabling debug package installation is from VSH cause the patches that exist from first CFW until today are in nas_plugin.sprx :/

 

[DeViL303]

no, disable qa then switch to retail vsh to see if that works.. the reason why it works on cfw is because of token patch + qa flag in eeprom.

View attachment 16162

View attachment 16163

Still there.

 

[Joonie]

Still there.


View attachment 16164

View attachment 16165

Ah you meant this one via pkg manager ok, now it makes sense.

 

[DeViL303]

Ah you meant this one via pkg manager ok, now it makes sense.

Ah yes, my point was we have the option showing.

 

[Louay]

Still there.


View attachment 16164

View attachment 16165

Yeah that's what i said in first post when i make this thread Install All Packages exist in CEX or DEX and when QA Flag enabled or not ,but when QA Flag is disabled CFW/HAN user will face error 8002AE32 like @DeViL303 and when QA Flag is enabled for CFW only users will be able to install multiple packages at once

 

[lmn7]

i don't know that enabling debug package installation is from VSH cause the patches that exist from first CFW until today are in nas_plugin.sprx :/

That's because the patches are done differently on CFW AFAIK.

+store_word(default_vsh_pub_toc, vsh_ps3xploit_key_toc)
+memcpy(vsh_ps3xploit_key_toc-0x20, index_key_addr, (index_key.length/2))
+memcpy(vsh_ps3xploit_key_toc,ps3xploit_ecdsa_key_addr,(ps3xploit_ecdsa_key.length/2))

^ Patching VSH memory.

 

[DeViL303]

Yes, So @Joonie, basically we have same issue on CFW , we have the option in package manager always, but it only works if QA flag is enabled, So if we could get it working all the time on CFW, that would be first step. It should not be majorly locked down, its not an important feature, i dont even know why its like this, you would think they would offer this feature to official DEX users.

 

[DeViL303]

That's because the patches are done differently on CFW AFAIK.

+store_word(default_vsh_pub_toc, vsh_ps3xploit_key_toc)
+memcpy(vsh_ps3xploit_key_toc-0x20, index_key_addr, (index_key.length/2))
+memcpy(vsh_ps3xploit_key_toc,ps3xploit_ecdsa_key_addr,(ps3xploit_ecdsa_key.length/2))

^ Patching VSH memory.

I think they can patch any files, because they also patch download plugin i think. and nas plugin. Maybe i am wrong.

 

[lmn7]

Yes, So @Joonie, basically we have same issue on CFW , we have the option in package manager always, but it only works if QA flag is enabled, So if we could get it working all the time on CFW, that would be first step. It should not be majorly locked down, its not an important feature, i dont even know why its like this, you would think they would offer this feature to official DEX users.

You would also think there would be a simple way to background download pkg files, but the PS3 works in mysterious ways

 

[Joonie]

Yes, So @Joonie, basically we have same issue on CFW , we have the option in package manager always, but it only works if QA flag is enabled, So if we could get it working all the time on CFW, that would be first step. It should not be majorly locked down, its not an important feature, i dont even know why its like this, you would think they would offer this feature to official DEX users.

@habib said it maybe doable by enabling fake qa from vsh, we will have to reverse "8002AE32" too.