@GoldenGamerV1 Enough of your immature behaviour. Also, stop asking about 4.83 on HAN; you have asked the same question three times in this thread over the last day, to the point it is becoming annoying and done deliberately to prove some sort of point. Be respectful of other forum members and stop spamming with repeated questions about HAN on 4.83. Consider this an informal warning.
F%$# you fake ass moderator delete me... First check out how rude your people was being to me before you come an try to judge sonething.
 
F%$# you fake ass moderator delete me... First check out how rude your people was being to me before you come an try to judge sonething.
You're not the victim here, so cut that out right away. You asked about 4.83 on HAN, and it was answered quickly and definitively. If you'd like to keep your posting privileges then I suggest you grow up very quickly, cut out the childish nonsense, and adhere to the rules of the forum.

Edit: Nevermind. :D
 
Edit: Nevermind. :D
Do you agree with Goldengamer that we were being rude against him? and not the other way? Cause I reread the thread just because of that edit and I found that I am pretty much the cause why he got triggered in the first place which lead to him getting banned.
So in short I indirectly got him banned.
Which leads to the question, will I get banned for indirectly getting another person banned?
 
First check out how rude your people was being to me before you come an try to judge

Hmm..... I'm sure it says " VENOM Elite Gaming " at the bottom of all my post's not " PSX-Place " and I don't see a " Moderator " sign below my name to imply I am site staff..... very odd reasoning....:confused:

sonething

Looks like someone needs spell checker again..... :D either that or needs to learn the difference between N and M as this is the second time these two basic letters have been confused in the same thread.....:confused::-p:D
 
Last edited:
Do you agree with Goldengamer that we were being rude against him? and not the other way? Cause I reread the thread just because of that edit and I found that I am pretty much the cause why he got triggered in the first place which lead to him getting banned.
So in short I indirectly got him banned.
Which leads to the question, will I get banned for indirectly getting another person banned?
Not at all. He appeared in the thread asking about 4.83 exploit, you explained to him that asking is pointless and he lashed out like an immature kid, as if to 'prove a point' that he can say what he wants on the forum. It turns out he can't. You as far as I can see did nothing wrong at all. He was the one with the attitude problem, not you. He got banned because he couldn't or wouldn't behave himself in a mature way, simple as that. You've got nothing to worry about. :)
 
Guys, I have a question. I'm gonna put it here and dont open other thead.

My cousion, he's gonna buy a second hand CFW PS3 compatible with a wifi/bluetooth module broken, the seller doesn't used it for a long time and he can't update it because show an error (I barelly know that PS3s with bd/bluetooth/wifi broken can't update because the system checks the console and if there's anything wrong, it wont update).

So, it's possible that the console its not on 4.83 or 4.82, what if is on 4.81 or less? What's the proceed? because the flash writer only works on 4.82, and the console can't update.

In that case, is the solution hack via hardware? I mean, with a hardware like E3 and donwngrade.

PD: sorry if my english was bad :-p
 
Do you agree with Goldengamer that we were being rude against him? and not the other way? Cause I reread the thread just because of that edit and I found that I am pretty much the cause why he got triggered in the first place which lead to him getting banned.
So in short I indirectly got him banned.
Which leads to the question, will I get banned for indirectly getting another person banned?
No he got banned by me and the reason he was banned for disrespecting staff and being a immature brat.

---

Now this thread is not about banning a member but hacking your PS3 Stay on topic offtopic post will be moved or cleaned. people looking to hack a ps3 sure in the hell dont want to read through pages of junk
 
Guys, I have a question. I'm gonna put it here and dont open other thead.

My cousion, he's gonna buy a second hand CFW PS3 compatible with a wifi/bluetooth module broken, the seller doesn't used it for a long time and he can't update it because show an error (I barelly know that PS3s with bd/bluetooth/wifi broken can't update because the system checks the console and if there's anything wrong, it wont update).

So, it's possible that the console its not on 4.83 or 4.82, what if is on 4.81 or less? What's the proceed? because the flash writer only works on 4.82, and the console can't update.

In that case, is the solution hack via hardware? I mean, with a hardware like E3 and donwngrade.

PD: sorry if my english was bad :-p
Hardware flasher is the way to go if its not on 4.82. E3 Flasher only applies to NOR consoles (Late FATS and SLIMS). Progskeet applies to both NAND and NOR
 
Guys, I have a question. I'm gonna put it here and dont open other thead.

My cousion, he's gonna buy a second hand CFW PS3 compatible with a wifi/bluetooth module broken, the seller doesn't used it for a long time and he can't update it because show an error (I barelly know that PS3s with bd/bluetooth/wifi broken can't update because the system checks the console and if there's anything wrong, it wont update).

So, it's possible that the console its not on 4.83 or 4.82, what if is on 4.81 or less? What's the proceed? because the flash writer only works on 4.82, and the console can't update.

In that case, is the solution hack via hardware? I mean, with a hardware like E3 and donwngrade.

PD: sorry if my english was bad :-p
If it's updated past 3.55 and below 4.82 an hardware flasher is the easiest way as far as I know. The exploit can be ported to a lower firmware but I don't know what all would need to be changed or how to make the patch file.
 
If it's updated past 3.55 and below 4.82 an hardware flasher is the easiest way as far as I know. The exploit can be ported to a lower firmware but I don't know what all would need to be changed or how to make the patch file.

A no FSM patch for the FW version this person is on followed by a NoBT CFW to bypass the damaged BT/Wifi module may do the trick. This is strange one to me as I could update my SuperSlims OFW with a damaged BT unit. Could at least try to update the OFW and then take it from there.

EDIT: or just go straight for the Hardware flasher JB to cut out the faffing about.
 
It can? I didnt know that was possible :eek:
Yeah, as far as I remember it was just made for 4.82 to keep things simple and because it was the latest update.

A no FSM patch for the FW version this person is on followed by a NoBT CFW to bypass the damaged BT/Wifi module may do the trick. This is strange one to me as I could update my SuperSlims OFW with a damaged BT unit. Could at least try to update the OFW and then take it from there.

EDIT: or just go straight for the Hardware flasher JB to cut out the faffing about.
Is that really all it takes to make the patch?
I agree a hardware flasher is the way to go.
 
A no FSM patch for the FW version this person is on followed by a NoBT CFW to bypass the damaged BT/Wifi module may do the trick. This is strange one to me as I could update my SuperSlims OFW with a damaged BT unit. Could at least try to update the OFW and then take it from there.

EDIT: or just go straight for the Hardware flasher JB to cut out the faffing about.
What is a NO FSM PATCH!?!?!?
I understand it is some sort of FSM removal but what does this do? How does it work?

Ive been puzzled reading threads and coming across no fsm patch here and there without knowing what it is.
 
Hardware flasher is the way to go if its not on 4.82. E3 Flasher only applies to NOR consoles (Late FATS and SLIMS). Progskeet applies to both NAND and NOR

If it's updated past 3.55 and below 4.82 an hardware flasher is the easiest way as far as I know. The exploit can be ported to a lower firmware but I don't know what all would need to be changed or how to make the patch file.

That's what I though. What a shame, I'm a completly noob in the hardware stuff. I'm gonna tell my cousin to still looking.

BTW, the seller tell my cousin, that his son isn't "touched" the console in a few years, so for sure is probably the ps3 is not on 4.82. He's a old man that does't know how turn it on, that's why we (my cousin and I) don't know exactly the firmware version.

Thanks to both.
 
Yeah, as far as I remember it was just made for 4.82 to keep things simple and because it was the latest update.


Is that really all it takes to make the patch?
I agree a hardware flasher is the way to go.

I am having a look through some GitHub Master repos for the PS3 Dump Checker to see what patches are available, I know of 4.82 NoFSM (used in the software exploit) and 4.83 NoFSM (with the latest PS3 Dump Checker), not sure about a 4.81 NoFSM, if there isn't one then it would be case of persuading a dev to make one for this. But either way on 4.82 and 4.83 there are NoFSM patches available and would be good to go.

, so for sure is probably the ps3 is not on 4.82.

If its on 4.82 or 4.83 there are NoFSM patches for these versions, and some very good tuts for using the hardware flasher, there a particularly good video tut I found for an E3 Flasher and is very easy to follow.
 
What is a NO FSM PATCH!?!?!?
I understand it is some sort of FSM removal but what does this do? How does it work?

Ive been puzzled reading threads and coming across no fsm patch here and there without knowing what it is.

The basics of it is that it allows you to install CFW directly from 4.82 and 4.83OFW after flashing the patched dump to your PS3 so you don't have to downgrade to 3.55. You downgraded to this because on this FW ver you simply had to install the CFW pup file and that was it, no exploit needed. These PS3' have whats called METLDR1 in them, S@ny ptches this in later PS3's in the form of METLDR2, this is why PS3's with a min fw ver of 3.56 and below are CFW compatible, technically the patch was introduced int fw ver 3.56 but didn't work as this was hacked, then metldr2 was introduced in to the later PS3 Slims with min fw ver of above 3.56a and is also in CECH4000's as well, this is why these PS3's are non CFW compatible.
 
The basics of it is that it allows you to install CFW directly from 4.82 and 4.83OFW after flashing the patched dump to your PS3 so you don't have to downgrade to 3.55. You downgraded to this because on this FW ver you simply had to install the CFW pup file and that was it, no exploit needed. These PS3' have whats called METLDR1 in them, S@ny ptches this in later PS3's in the form of METLDR2, this is why PS3's with a min fw ver of 3.56 and below are CFW compatible, technically the patch was introduced int fw ver 3.56 but didn't work as this was hacked, then metldr2 was introduced in to the later PS3 Slims with min fw ver of above 3.56a and is also in CECH4000's as well, this is why these PS3's are non CFW compatible.
Soo, you use a Hardware Flasher to flash the patched dump back to the PS3, which enables installation of CFW? Thats pretty cool. Is that what PS3Xploit does?

Sounds somewhat like XBOX 360 exploitation, in which you read the NAND with a NAND-X or JR-Programmer V2, then modify the NAND and then reflash it with the programmer.
Thats just the beginning of exploiting, whether it is JTAG or RGH, but this first step atleast sounds like No FSM Patching.
 
Is that what PS3Xploit does?

Does the same thing, with a few differences being you don't have to take apart your PS3 and don't have to downgrade. But with the NoFSM Patches you don't have to downgrade with the hardware flasher either now as long as the OFW ver is 482 or 4.83. Its a software version of what the hardware flasher does making it easier to JB your PS3.
 
Back
Top