Workz_777
Senior Member
Friends...
Important to know... about MX4SIO + OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917)
If you have a non-Deckard PS2 (IOP - 70K model and lower) then the latest OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) will not be as fast for you, and can cause stuttering FMVs and stuttering game play, when compared to OPL BDM3...
...because OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) has checksumming which makes the non-Deckard PS2 slower. But for Deckard PS2s using OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) is about the same as OPL BDM3.
Here is what MX4SIO OPL BDM3 Dev - Maximus32 said about the latest OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) - "It has checksumming enabled, bdm3 did not have checksumming. This makes the current mx4sio slower on FAT ps2's, but almost the same speed on slim ps2's."
So in short...
If you have a Slim (Deckard) PS2 (75K and above) welcome to the OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) party with exFAT + VMC functionality.
If you have a Phat PS2, for now it would be better to keep with OPL BDM3 for best performance (smooth FMVs and game play).
Important to know... about MX4SIO + OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917)
If you have a non-Deckard PS2 (IOP - 70K model and lower) then the latest OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) will not be as fast for you, and can cause stuttering FMVs and stuttering game play, when compared to OPL BDM3...
...because OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) has checksumming which makes the non-Deckard PS2 slower. But for Deckard PS2s using OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) is about the same as OPL BDM3.
Here is what MX4SIO OPL BDM3 Dev - Maximus32 said about the latest OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) - "It has checksumming enabled, bdm3 did not have checksumming. This makes the current mx4sio slower on FAT ps2's, but almost the same speed on slim ps2's."
So in short...
If you have a Slim (Deckard) PS2 (75K and above) welcome to the OPL Beta v1.2.0 (1917) party with exFAT + VMC functionality.
If you have a Phat PS2, for now it would be better to keep with OPL BDM3 for best performance (smooth FMVs and game play).
Last edited:




