You are right, even though the path is a little cryptic... [emoji6]
The problem with this is that the patching is the responsibility of the CFW maker...
Unless everyone agrees to use the same emer_init.self paths, there is bound to be discrepancies in this logic...
Even if that responsibility was given to Cobra, what when Cobra is disabled? And what of mamba then? Or a standard CEX CFW?
And we are back to CFW makers...
The problem with this is that the patching is the responsibility of the CFW maker...
Unless everyone agrees to use the same emer_init.self paths, there is bound to be discrepancies in this logic...
Even if that responsibility was given to Cobra, what when Cobra is disabled? And what of mamba then? Or a standard CEX CFW?
And we are back to CFW makers...
Last edited: