I profess the idea of sticking to proper terminology, always. User must learn how to use it, not learn that he can write whatever he want and expecting that world will be aligned to him. That's how science works. And this rule including me, as as I'm still human, I making mistakes sometimes, which I'm expecting someone will correcting when spot - in his way he choose (polite, not polite, feelings of a target doesn't matter, information matter).I answered a simple question with the same simplicity, that's all. The answer given is consistent with the way the question was asked.
TBH You have answered like one so do not be surprised. I don't remember all people I've met "inside" the internet, nor all what they said. So if I don't remember someone, I treating it like carte blanche, mostly based on what he said, where he said, how he said it and when he said. Predictive conditioning proves works best for me.It's not nice to be treated like an ignorant. Of course, I know all of this.
That makes zero sense...I think when you have larger file size the fragmentation is smaller
I am not quite sure about that! I think BDM can!or without any partition table
Nah! Keep posting!I will remain a silent user.
AFAIK it is not yet fixed and @Maximus32 found that bug to be present since OPL 0.5!!! Read-stop-read-stop-read-stop@TnA i remember you saying somewhere that was found an OPL bug that is present since 0.8 and is capable of improving the perfomance when it gets fixed if i remember correctly, it was been fixed by now in the recent beta release ?
BDM doesn't decide that, it's the fatfs driver that has support for multiple partitions and mount points, but I didn't add support for more than one mount point for the main partition.I am not quite sure about that! I think BDM can!
sudo mkexfatfs /dev/sdx
sudo mkexfatfs -s 64 /dev/sdx
Wow that means if this gets fixed... that will be huge improvement along with read ahead support !! i really can't wait to try itThat makes zero sense...
I am not quite sure about that! I think BDM can!
Nah! Keep posting!
AFAIK it is not yet fixed and @Maximus32 found that bug to be present since OPL 0.5!!! Read-stop-read-stop-read-stop![]()

Sounds great to me !! I'll be ready to test some games when this bug gets fixedWell... Maybe not "huge", but I think "noticeable" at the very least!

You're probably using an older build, newest beta in the official github page contains a new feature to support fragmented games (exFAT and ZSO are also part of this beta).Game was just fragmented, after defrag worked flawlessly
that mean opl with exfat support dont prompt when game is fragmented?